These numbers assume the dial reads 0 where the burrs touch. Many grinders ship with the 0 somewhere else. If your filter setting is around 70, your zero is offset, so shift every number here by the same amount.
Settings by brew method
| Method | Setting (dial) | As the source puts it | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Espresso | 5 to 17 | Espresso 5 to 17 | coffeechronicler.com Reviewer |
| Moka pot | 17 to 25 | Moka pot 17 to 25 | coffeechronicler.com Reviewer |
| AeroPress | 25 to 40 | AeroPress 25 to 40 | coffeechronicler.com Reviewer |
| Pour-over / V60 | 40 to 55 | Pour over 40 to 55 (Grindlogic 30 to 60) | coffeechronicler.com Reviewer |
| French press | 55 to 65 | French press 55 to 65 | coffeechronicler.com Reviewer |
| Cold brew | 65 to 90 | Cold brew 65 to 90 | honestcoffeeguide.com Reviewer |
These are starting points. Beans, roast, water and your own taste all move them, so start in the middle of the range and adjust one step at a time.
Notchbook is a free app that remembers the setting that worked on your DF64 Gen 2 for each coffee and brew method, and keeps a journal of every brew. Get it free on Google Play. The iPhone app is coming soon. More about Notchbook.
About the DF64 Gen 2
- Type
- Electric grinder
- Burrs
- Flat, 64 mm
- Adjustment
- Stepless
Dialling in from here
- Sour, thin or fast? Grind finer. Why coffee tastes sour
- Bitter, dry or slow? Grind coarser. Why coffee tastes bitter
- Espresso: how to dial in. Filter: pour-over grind size.
Compare with other grinders in the grind size chart.
What reviewers found
The popular budget 64 mm flat-burr grinder. It's good value and takes aftermarket burrs, though it usually needs some tinkering.
Specs
| Motor | 250 W at 1400 rpm. It slows under load at fine settings with high-friction burrs 0:30 3:01 |
| Dial (Gen 1) | Stepless, numbered 0 to 85. The espresso zone is a narrow span at the fine end, and the coarse end goes past about 2500 µm 0:30 |
| Zero | On Lance Hedrick's grinder the burrs chirp at zero 0:30. In 2025 he found the point where the burrs touch by running it slowly until it rubbed 2:04 |
| Gen 2 | No auger 8:08, and the burrs are horizontal 18:09 |
Starting settings
These are the settings each creator gave, measured from their own grinder's zero. Use them as a starting point.
| Method | Setting | Context | Confidence | By | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Espresso | a few numbers coarser than burr touch, then finer | His 2025 starting method for a Nordic light roast, 19 g in and about 48 g out. The first, coarser try was slightly sour | stated | Hedrick | 8:14 |
| Pour-over | about 1100 µm (grind size, not a dial number) | Light roast, stock burrs, 15 g to 250 g, drawdown of about 245 s | approx | Hedrick | 17:36 |
| Espresso | same dial, 28 s with a fast feed against about 12 s with a slow feed | approx | Hedrick | 8:08 | |
| Espresso | coarse (similar to the Nordic, coarser than a normal setting) | Ultra-light Gesha, 19 g in and about 70 g out (1:3.5), about 20 s at 1.5 to 2 bar | approx | Hedrick | 13:49 |
| Espresso | same grind, then slightly coarser | Heavily processed Ombligon, 18.8 g in and about 47 g out (1:2.5), 16 s at about 3 bar after going coarser from 9 bar | approx | Hedrick | 17:53 |
| Espresso | coarser than the Nordic, then slightly finer | Washed Kenya aged 5 months, 19 g in, 1:2.5, 16 s at about 3 bar | approx | Hedrick | 25:29 |
| Espresso | went too coarse, then two steps finer | Dark Arabica/Robusta Italian blend, about 1:2 in 23 s at 9 bar with tiger striping | approx | Hedrick | 35:34 |
| Espresso | 19g in, 45g out in about 30 to 32 s | Light roast, stock burrs, dialled in much like a Mignon Oro | approx | Hedrick | 24:27 |
| Espresso | dialled for a 28 s shot (no number given) | 18 g in and about 38 g out. With four sprays of water the same setting ran about 38 s | approx | Hoffmann | 11:43 |
| Pour-over | finer end of the filter range | Lighter roasts | approx | Hoffmann | 11:17 |
| Espresso | 10 | Gen 2, 16 g in and 15.9 g out from a cold start. A typical espresso setting | stated | Chronicler | 4:34 |
| Immersion | 50 | DF64, 2021 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
| Pour-over | 35 to 45 | DF64, 2021 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
| AeroPress | 25 to 35 | DF64, 2021 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
| Moka | 17 to 25 | DF64, 2021 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
| Espresso | 8 to 19 | DF64, 2021 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
| Immersion | 55 to 65 | DF64 Gen 2, 2023 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
| Pour-over | 40 to 55 | DF64 Gen 2, 2023 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
| AeroPress | 25 to 40 | DF64 Gen 2, 2023 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
| Moka | 17 to 25 | DF64 Gen 2, 2023 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
| Espresso | 5 to 17 | DF64 Gen 2, 2023 chart. Reader-submitted and approximate | approx | Christensen | grind size chart |
Cup profile
- With the stock burrs, filter is acceptable but has muted acidity and more body, like an unaligned stock EK43. Espresso is syrupy and vibrant, with light-roast citrus and some astringency 0:30.
- SSP multi-purpose burrs give the most clarity and a thin body 0:30.
- 2025: a little more acidity than a J-Max in espresso, and blendier filter 16:54.
Strengths
- A huge choice of 64 mm burrs, at a good price 0:30.
- Fewer fines than a Mignon Oro in Lance Hedrick's sieve test 16:27.
- The Gen 2 held the same setting for about 80 shots 13:41.
Weaknesses
- The stock chute and declumper clog and hold coffee, there's heavy static, and alignment is worse than the Mignon Oro 0:30 17:28.
- Gen 2: horizontal mounting, alignment and retention 18:09.
Verdict
2022: a strong budget pick, best with SSP burrs and a modded chute 0:30. 2023: popular, but it usually needs tweaks 9:09. 2024: the Gen 2 does its job 13:41, grade B 18:09. 2025: good hand grinders can beat it for similar money 16:54.
James Hoffmann's take
- 2023 (DF64 Gen 2): a big upgrade on the Gen 1, a strong 64 mm burr platform, and one of his two finalists under £500. Light-roast filter tended to sit at the finer end of the filter range 1:33 11:17.
- In his RDT test, a DF64 Gen 2 shot dialled for 28 s ran about 38 s at the same setting with four sprays of water, with no visible change in particle distribution 11:43 17:22.
Daddy Got Coffee's take
- 2023 (Gen 2): it fixed most of the Gen 1 complaints. It has an ionizer, 18 g goes in and comes out without RDT or bellows, alignment is perfect and the burrs are balanced. His top all-round pick under $400, though it's very loud 1:33 5:38 7:09.
Kyle Rowsell's take
- 2022 (Gen 1): the best-value flat-burr single doser at about $400. The stock Italmill burrs are clean, sweet and transparent with some texture. SSP multi-purpose adds striking clarity but little texture, and SSP HU keeps more. Against it are static, a declumper that holds coffee, a hard-to-read multi-turn dial, a loud motor, alignment work and 10 to 15 lb of beans to season. Fitting SSP burrs moved his zero by about 30. Mods sort out a lot of the mess and the popcorning 5:38 0:32 13:42.
- 2023 (Gen 2): all metal, with an anti-popcorn disc, a plasma generator, easy zeroing and low retention without bellows. Its hybrid burr (the DF64V's burr without the coating) cleans up filter while keeping body in espresso. His new budget gold standard from $399. The motor is a little loud and the dial numbers scratch 20:00.
The Coffee Chronicler's take
- 2022 (Gen 1): the best all-rounder for tinkerers, with a huge range of upgrades. The stock burrs are a little less clear than a C40 or K-Max for drip and sieved worst of his four flats. The declumper is restrictive, there's static, the catch cup sits far from the chute, and his grinder needed a circuit-board repair 13:50.
- 2023 (Gen 2): what the Gen 1 should have been, with 0.1 to 0.3 g retention, a plasma generator and a good anti-popcorn disc. The new burrs give crisp, acid-forward filter (3.75 out of 5, against 2.5 for the old burrs) and modern espresso with body. Solid value, with a burr size that won't date, and better for swaps and espresso than a Sculptor 064S, but noisy with SSP multi-purpose burrs 12:14 7:40 11:03.
- 2026: at its fixed 1400 rpm he reckons it gets perhaps 85 to 90% of what SSP brew burrs can do, so he points pour-over buyers to models with variable speed 2:31.
Sprometheus's take
- 2024 (V2 against the DF54): 18 g of espresso in about 11 s, a slightly tighter particle spread and more burr options, for about $170 more and some 5 lb extra. The stock cup is the same 6:17.
Bluebird Coffee Roastery's take
- 2021, his home espresso grinder (the G-iota-branded Gen 1 with the newer declumper). It's heavy and solid for the money, at under about R10,000 in South Africa, imported and serviced locally. It's quiet, a threaded external collar keeps grounds out, the dosing cup suits a 58 mm portafilter, and there are SSP burr options for filter or espresso. The printed mark isn't true zero, so he marks the real one on the burr carrier. Espresso was very good, and filter was behind his hand grinder. Grounds still hide behind the declumper even with the bellows, the heavy lid is awkward to pump, a silicone sleeve on the dosing fork split early and the springs needed reseating out of the box 2:35 3:38 6:13 7:45.
Notes
- Slow feeding on a Gen 2 cut a 28 s shot to about 12 s at the same setting, so expect to go finer if you change how you feed it 8:08.
- Flat burrs are harder to dial in than conicals. Lance Hedrick starts coarse and works finer 2:04 7:14.
Sources
- Kyle Rowsell: Niche Zero | Still Worth It?! (2021-07-27)
- Bluebird Coffee Roastery: REVIEW: DF64 || Includes post Hoffman review updates (2021-09-27)
- Kyle Rowsell: The TRUTH About DF64 | A Budget Do It All Grinder? (VS Eureka Mignon Single Dose) (2022-01-28)
- Kyle Rowsell: DF64 Upgrades That Transform The Grinder (2022-05-19)
- Lance Hedrick: DF64 GRINDER: EXHAUSTIVE REVIEW (2022-05-25)
- The Coffee Chronicler: The Best Grinder for Filter Coffee? (2022-06-19)
- The Coffee Chronicler: DF64 GEN 2 REVIEW: Flaws Fixed? (2023-08-13)
- Lance Hedrick: ULTIMATE GUIDE TO BUYING A COFFEE GRINDER (2023-08-21)
- Kyle Rowsell: BEST NEW 64MM GRINDER? DF64 GEN 2 vs ZERNO Z1 vs DF64V vs KOPI (2023-08-24)
- Daddy Got Coffee: I didn't want to review this...: DF64 Gen 2 Coffee Grinder (2023-11-01)
- The Coffee Chronicler: THE FINAL VERDICT: DF-Grinder Showdown (2023-11-09)
- James Hoffmann: Science Discovers What We All Missed: More Than An Anti-Static Hack (2023-12-08)
- James Hoffmann: The Best Espresso Grinder Under £500 (2023-12-22)
- Lance Hedrick: INSTANT IMPROVEMENT ON ANY GRINDER: How Slow Feeding Completely Changes Your Grinding (2024-02-22)
- Lance Hedrick: GRINDER REVIEW: Timemore 078/064, DF83v, DF64 Gen 2, Gevi Grindmaster, DF64v (2024-03-08)
- Sprometheus: DF54 vs. DF64 | How Much Difference Can 10 Millimeters Make? (2024-03-22)
- The Coffee Chronicler: Buying a coffee grinder? Here's what I'd do (2024-08-05)
- Lance Hedrick: Grinder Tier List (2024-09-10)
- Lance Hedrick: Dialing in Espresso: A Very Good Guide, Maybe the Best (2025-06-18)
- Lance Hedrick: Can Handgrinders Beat Electric? Espresso Edition (2025-08-07)
- The Coffee Chronicler: Buying a pour over grinder? Here's what I'd do (2026-08-31)
- Asser Christensen, The Coffee Chronicler (website): Grind Size Chart & Database (2025-08-29)
Summarised in our own words from the creators' videos, with every point linked to the moment it comes from. Notchbook isn't affiliated with or endorsed by any of these creators, so please watch the originals for full context. Sources